CPT and CIP are nearly identical — same transport modes, same risk-transfer point — with exactly one difference: insurance.
| CPT — Carriage Paid To | CIP — Carriage and Insurance Paid To | |
|---|---|---|
| Transport mode | Any mode | Any mode |
| Risk transfers | When goods are handed to the first carrier at origin | When goods are handed to the first carrier at origin |
Both CPT and CIP require the seller to pay carriage (freight) to the named destination, and both transfer risk to the buyer as soon as goods are handed to the first carrier at origin — well before arrival. The only difference is that CIP additionally requires the seller to arrange all-risk cargo insurance to the destination; under CPT, insurance is entirely optional and left to whichever party wants coverage to arrange and pay for it themselves.
Insurance is being arranged separately by the buyer, or the goods are low-value enough that formal cargo insurance isn't commercially necessary.
You want the insurance requirement built into the trade term itself, removing any ambiguity about whether the shipment is covered in transit.
CIP is generally better for the buyer, since it guarantees all-risk insurance coverage is in place for the entire journey to destination, even though the buyer bears the transit risk from the first carrier handover in both terms. Under CPT, the buyer would need to arrange their own insurance to be covered.
The seller arranges the insurance, but Incoterms 2020 sets the minimum standard at all-risk (Institute Cargo Clauses A) for CIP — buyer and seller can agree a higher level, but not lower, without amending the contract terms explicitly.
Cost and flexibility — CPT lets the buyer arrange their own insurance (perhaps through an existing policy that's cheaper than what the seller could offer), or skip insurance entirely for low-risk, low-value cargo where the premium isn't worth it.
Compare DHL, UPS, FedEx, DPD and GLS rates in seconds — whichever Incoterm you're using.
Get a Free Quote →